11107

Data Structures for Task-based Priority Scheduling

Martin Wimmer, Daniel Cederman, Francesco Versaci, Jesper Larsson Traff, Philippas Tsigas
Faculty of Informatics, Vienna University of Technology, Favoritenstrasse 16, 1040 Vienna, Austria
arXiv:1312.2501 [cs.DC], (9 Dec 2013)
@article{2013arXiv1312.2501W,

   author={Wimmer}, M. and {Cederman}, D. and {Versaci}, F. and {Larsson Tr{"a}ff}, J. and {Tsigas}, P.},

   title={"{Data Structures for Task-based Priority Scheduling}"},

   journal={ArXiv e-prints},

   archivePrefix={"arXiv"},

   eprint={1312.2501},

   primaryClass={"cs.DC"},

   keywords={Computer Science – Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing},

   year={2013},

   month={dec},

   adsurl={http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1312.2501W},

   adsnote={Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}

}

Download Download (PDF)   View View   Source Source   Source codes Source codes

Package:

1185

views

Many task-parallel applications can benefit from attempting to execute tasks in a specific order, as for instance indicated by priorities associated with the tasks. We present three lock-free data structures for priority scheduling with different trade-offs on scalability and ordering guarantees. First we propose a basic extension to work-stealing that provides good scalability, but cannot provide any guarantees for task-ordering in-between threads. Next, we present a centralized priority data structure based on k-fifo queues, which provides strong (but still relaxed with regard to a sequential specification) guarantees. The parameter k allows to dynamically configure the trade-off between scalability and the required ordering guarantee. Third, and finally, we combine both data structures into a hybrid, k-priority data structure, which provides scalability similar to the work-stealing based approach for larger k, while giving strong ordering guarantees for smaller k. We argue for using the hybrid data structure as the best compromise for generic, priority-based task-scheduling. We analyze the behavior and trade-offs of our data structures in the context of a simple parallelization of Dijkstra’s single-source shortest path algorithm. Our theoretical analysis and simulations show that both the centralized and the hybrid k-priority based data structures can give strong guarantees on the useful work performed by the parallel Dijkstra algorithm. We support our results with experimental evidence on an 80-core Intel Xeon system.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

* * *

* * *

Follow us on Twitter

HGPU group

1897 peoples are following HGPU @twitter

Like us on Facebook

HGPU group

423 people like HGPU on Facebook

HGPU group © 2010-2016 hgpu.org

All rights belong to the respective authors

Contact us: