Data Structures for Task-based Priority Scheduling

Martin Wimmer, Daniel Cederman, Francesco Versaci, Jesper Larsson Traff, Philippas Tsigas
Faculty of Informatics, Vienna University of Technology, Favoritenstrasse 16, 1040 Vienna, Austria
arXiv:1312.2501 [cs.DC], (9 Dec 2013)

   author={Wimmer}, M. and {Cederman}, D. and {Versaci}, F. and {Larsson Tr{"a}ff}, J. and {Tsigas}, P.},

   title={"{Data Structures for Task-based Priority Scheduling}"},

   journal={ArXiv e-prints},




   keywords={Computer Science – Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing},




   adsnote={Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}


Download Download (PDF)   View View   Source Source   Source codes Source codes




Many task-parallel applications can benefit from attempting to execute tasks in a specific order, as for instance indicated by priorities associated with the tasks. We present three lock-free data structures for priority scheduling with different trade-offs on scalability and ordering guarantees. First we propose a basic extension to work-stealing that provides good scalability, but cannot provide any guarantees for task-ordering in-between threads. Next, we present a centralized priority data structure based on k-fifo queues, which provides strong (but still relaxed with regard to a sequential specification) guarantees. The parameter k allows to dynamically configure the trade-off between scalability and the required ordering guarantee. Third, and finally, we combine both data structures into a hybrid, k-priority data structure, which provides scalability similar to the work-stealing based approach for larger k, while giving strong ordering guarantees for smaller k. We argue for using the hybrid data structure as the best compromise for generic, priority-based task-scheduling. We analyze the behavior and trade-offs of our data structures in the context of a simple parallelization of Dijkstra’s single-source shortest path algorithm. Our theoretical analysis and simulations show that both the centralized and the hybrid k-priority based data structures can give strong guarantees on the useful work performed by the parallel Dijkstra algorithm. We support our results with experimental evidence on an 80-core Intel Xeon system.
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

* * *

* * *

Follow us on Twitter

HGPU group

1580 peoples are following HGPU @twitter

Like us on Facebook

HGPU group

293 people like HGPU on Facebook

* * *

Free GPU computing nodes at hgpu.org

Registered users can now run their OpenCL application at hgpu.org. We provide 1 minute of computer time per each run on two nodes with two AMD and one nVidia graphics processing units, correspondingly. There are no restrictions on the number of starts.

The platforms are

Node 1
  • GPU device 0: nVidia GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2GB, 822MHz
  • GPU device 1: AMD/ATI Radeon HD 6970 2GB, 880MHz
  • CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 @ 2.8GHz 1055T
  • RAM: 12GB
  • OS: OpenSUSE 13.1
  • SDK: nVidia CUDA Toolkit 6.5.14, AMD APP SDK 3.0
Node 2
  • GPU device 0: AMD/ATI Radeon HD 7970 3GB, 1000MHz
  • GPU device 1: AMD/ATI Radeon HD 5870 2GB, 850MHz
  • CPU: Intel Core i7-2600 @ 3.4GHz
  • RAM: 16GB
  • OS: OpenSUSE 12.3
  • SDK: AMD APP SDK 3.0

Completed OpenCL project should be uploaded via User dashboard (see instructions and example there), compilation and execution terminal output logs will be provided to the user.

The information send to hgpu.org will be treated according to our Privacy Policy

HGPU group © 2010-2015 hgpu.org

All rights belong to the respective authors

Contact us: