{"id":11259,"date":"2014-01-17T00:10:07","date_gmt":"2014-01-16T22:10:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/hgpu.org\/?p=11259"},"modified":"2014-01-17T00:10:07","modified_gmt":"2014-01-16T22:10:07","slug":"performance-engineering-for-a-medical-imaging-application-on-the-intel-xeon-phi-accelerator","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/?p=11259","title":{"rendered":"Performance Engineering for a Medical Imaging Application on the Intel Xeon Phi Accelerator"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We examine the Xeon Phi, which is based on Intel&#8217;s Many Integrated Cores architecture, for its suitability to run the FDK algorithm&#8211;the most commonly used algorithm to perform the 3D image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography. We study the challenges of efficiently parallelizing the application and means to enable sensible data sharing between threads despite the lack of a shared last level cache. Apart from parallelization, SIMD vectorization is critical for good performance on the Xeon Phi; we perform various micro-benchmarks to investigate the platform&#8217;s new set of vector instructions and put a special emphasis on the newly introduced vector gather capability. We refine a previous performance model for the application and adapt it for the Xeon Phi to validate the performance of our optimized hand-written assembly implementation, as well as the performance of several different auto-vectorization approaches.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We examine the Xeon Phi, which is based on Intel&#8217;s Many Integrated Cores architecture, for its suitability to run the FDK algorithm&#8211;the most commonly used algorithm to perform the 3D image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography. We study the challenges of efficiently parallelizing the application and means to enable sensible data sharing between threads despite [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":351,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[11,38,3],"tags":[451,479,1782,478,512,1483,1788,67],"class_list":["post-11259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computer-science","category-medicine","category-paper","tag-benchmarking","tag-computed-tomography","tag-computer-science","tag-ct","tag-image-reconstruction","tag-intel-xeon-phi","tag-medicine","tag-performance"],"views":2142,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/351"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}