{"id":17293,"date":"2017-06-17T18:47:32","date_gmt":"2017-06-17T15:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/?p=17293"},"modified":"2017-06-17T18:47:32","modified_gmt":"2017-06-17T15:47:32","slug":"non-hydrostatic-pressure-shallow-flows-gpu-implementation-using-finite-volume-and-finite-difference-scheme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/?p=17293","title":{"rendered":"Non-Hydrostatic Pressure Shallow Flows: GPU Implementation Using Finite-Volume and Finite-Difference Scheme"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We consider the depth-integrated non-hydrostatic system derived by Yamazaki et al. An efficient formally second-order well-balanced hybrid finite volume\/difference numerical scheme is proposed. The scheme consists in a two-step algorithm. First, the hyperbolic part of the system is discretized using a PVM path-conservative finite-volume method. Second, the dispersive terms are solved by means of compact finite differences. A new methodology is also presented to handle wave breaking over complex bathymetries. This adapts well to GPU-architectures and guidelines about its GPU implementation are introduced. The method has been applied to idealized and challenging experimental test cases, which shows the efficiency and accuracy of the method.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We consider the depth-integrated non-hydrostatic system derived by Yamazaki et al. An efficient formally second-order well-balanced hybrid finite volume\/difference numerical scheme is proposed. The scheme consists in a two-step algorithm. First, the hyperbolic part of the system is discretized using a PVM path-conservative finite-volume method. Second, the dispersive terms are solved by means of compact [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":351,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[36,89,104,157,3],"tags":[1787,14,327,1795,1796,628,20],"class_list":["post-17293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-algorithms","category-nvidia-cuda","category-fluid-dynamics","category-mathematics","category-paper","tag-algorithms","tag-cuda","tag-finite-difference","tag-fluid-dynamics","tag-mathematics","tag-numerical-analysis","tag-nvidia"],"views":3613,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/351"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17293\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hgpu.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}