17440

Scaling Deep Learning on GPU and Knights Landing clusters

Yang You, Aydin Buluc, James Demmel
Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley
arXiv:1708.02983 [cs.DC], (9 Aug 2017)

@article{you2017scaling,

   title={Scaling Deep Learning on GPU and Knights Landing clusters},

   author={You, Yang and Buluc, Aydin and Demmel, James},

   year={2017},

   month={aug},

   archivePrefix={"arXiv"},

   primaryClass={cs.DC},

   doi={10.1145/3126908.3126912}

}

The speed of deep neural networks training has become a big bottleneck of deep learning research and development. For example, training GoogleNet by ImageNet dataset on one Nvidia K20 GPU needs 21 days. To speed up the training process, the current deep learning systems heavily rely on the hardware accelerators. However, these accelerators have limited on-chip memory compared with CPUs. To handle large datasets, they need to fetch data from either CPU memory or remote processors. We use both self-hosted Intel Knights Landing (KNL) clusters and multi-GPU clusters as our target platforms. From an algorithm aspect, current distributed machine learning systems are mainly designed for cloud systems. These methods are asynchronous because of the slow network and high fault-tolerance requirement on cloud systems. We focus on Elastic Averaging SGD (EASGD) to design algorithms for HPC clusters. Original EASGD used round-robin method for communication and updating. The communication is ordered by the machine rank ID, which is inefficient on HPC clusters. First, we redesign four efficient algorithms for HPC systems to improve EASGD’s poor scaling on clusters. Async EASGD, Async MEASGD, and Hogwild EASGD are faster than their existing counterparts (Async SGD, Async MSGD, and Hogwild SGD, resp.) in all the comparisons. Finally, we design Sync EASGD, which ties for the best performance among all the methods while being deterministic. In addition to the algorithmic improvements, we use some system-algorithm codesign techniques to scale up the algorithms. By reducing the percentage of communication from 87% to 14%, our Sync EASGD achieves 5.3x speedup over original EASGD on the same platform. We get 91.5% weak scaling efficiency on 4253 KNL cores, which is higher than the state-of-the-art implementation.
Rating: 3.5. From 2 votes.
Please wait...

* * *

* * *

HGPU group © 2010-2017 hgpu.org

All rights belong to the respective authors

Contact us: