18341

Improving tasks throughput on accelerators using OpenCL command concurrency

A.J. Lazaro-Munoz, J.M. Gonzalez-Linares, J. Gomez-Luna, N. Guil
Dep. of Computer Architecture, University of Malaga, Spain
arXiv:1806.10113 [cs.DC], (26 Jun 2018)

@article{lazaro-munoz2018improving,

   title={Improving tasks throughput on accelerators using OpenCL command concurrency},

   author={Lazaro-Munoz, A.J. and Gonzalez-Linares, J.M. and Gomez-Luna, J. and Guil, N.},

   year={2018},

   month={jun},

   archivePrefix={"arXiv"},

   primaryClass={cs.DC}

}

Download Download (PDF)   View View   Source Source   

235

views

A heterogeneous architecture composed by a host and an accelerator must frequently deal with situations where several independent tasks are available to be offloaded onto the accelerator. These tasks can be generated by concurrent applications executing in the host or, in case the host is a node of a computer cluster, by applications running on other cluster nodes that are willing to offload tasks in the accelerator connected to the host. In this work we show that a runtime scheduler that selects the best execution order of a group of tasks on the accelerator can significantly reduce the total execution time of the tasks and, consequently, increase the accelerator use. Our solution is based on a temporal execution model that is able to predict with high accuracy the execution time of a set of concurrent tasks launched on the accelerator. The execution model has been validated in AMD, NVIDIA, and Xeon Phi devices using synthetic benchmarks. Moreover, employing the temporal execution model, a heuristic is proposed which is able to establish a near-optimal tasks execution ordering that significantly reduces the total execution time, including data transfers.The heuristic has been evaluated with five different benchmarks composed of dominant kernel and dominant transfer real tasks. Experiments indicate the heuristic is able to find always an ordering with a better execution time than the average of every possible execution order and, most times, it achieves a near-optimal ordering (very close to the execution time of the best execution order) with a negligible overhead. Concretely, our heuristic obtains, on average for all the devices, between 84% and 96% of the improvement achieved by the best execution order.
Rating: 3.0/5. From 2 votes.
Please wait...

* * *

* * *

HGPU group © 2010-2018 hgpu.org

All rights belong to the respective authors

Contact us: